Connect with us
SS

Latest News

Court Asks Flipkart To Stop Selling GOQii Products

Published

on

Court Asks Flipkart To Stop Selling GOQii Products,Startup Stories,Business Latest News 2019,Flipkart GOQii Products,Court Restraints Flipkart Products,Flipkart Latest News,GOQii Wearable Products,Flipkart Wearable Devices,Flipkart GOQii Case,Flipkart GOQii Products Allegations


On the 27th of May, a Civil Court in Mumbai issued an order restraining the e commerce giant Flipkart, from selling GOQii’s wearable products at large discounts. The restraint order came shortly after the Ratan Tata backed GOQii, issued a legal notice to Flipkart, saying they were facing a massive loss because of the huge discounts offered by Flipkart on GOQii’s products.

According to the legal notice filed by GOQii on the 18th of May, Flipkart was selling its products at a discount of 70% to 80% on the website, a practice which GOQii calls predatory pricing. Not only were these discounts going against the original agreement between GOQii and Flipkart, they are also violating foriegn investment policy in e commerce– since Flipkart is owned by Walmart.

In the issue notice against Flipkart, GOQii said because of this predatory pricing, a lot of their existing orders were also being cancelled. The wearable products manufacturer said its partners were not happy with the lowering of the prices as a result of which their profits were being slashed as well. Partners like Croma and other distributors are extremely unhappy with GOQii right now and are not taking any further orders.

Before the restraint order was filed against Flipkart, the e commerce platform responded to the allegations and said the complaints were baseless. Walmart owned Flipkart said the sales of the products were declining not because of their pricing policy, but because of the nature of the products.

In response to this, Vishal Gondal (founder and CEO of GOQii) said, “We urge Flipkart/Walmart to not use its position of dominance to compromise SMEs/startups. Such practices are not in the best interest of the ecosystem. Deep discounting continues to hurt GOQii business.”

This is not the first time a complaint like this was filed against Flipkart . In the year 2017, similar issues of predatory pricing were also brought to the attention of the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) and the Competition Commission of India (CCI) by the All India Online Vendors’ Association. Even though GOQii had issued the legal notice, Flipkart refused to stop the discounts. Hence,  with no other way out, the GOQii had to go to court.

In its order, the Mumbai Civil Court and Sessions Court said it was necessary to place this restraint order in an attempt to level the playing field and to reduce the amount of damages incurred by GOQii.

Stay tuned for more updates.

Latest News

Supreme Court Puts End to Misleading Celebrity Endorsements 

Published

on

Supreme Court Of India

The Supreme Court of India has taken a strong stance against misleading advertisements featuring public figures, emphasizing their responsibility in promoting products. This decision comes in response to concerns about the influence celebrities and public figures hold over consumer choices.

 

The Heart of the Matter:

 

The court’s ruling highlights two key points:

 

  1. Shared Responsibility: Advertisers, advertising agencies, and the public figures endorsing products are all equally liable for issuing misleading advertisements. This means that celebrities can no longer simply lend their face to a product without due diligence. They are expected to have a good understanding of the product and its claims before endorsing it.

 

  1. Self-Declaration:  The court mandated a stricter protocol requiring advertisers to obtain a self-declaration from endorsers. This declaration, similar to the Cable Television Networks Rules (1994), ensures that the advertised product complies with existing laws and avoids offensive content.

 

Why it Matters:

 

Celebrity endorsements hold immense power in influencing consumer behavior. Consumers often trust the judgment of their favorite actors, athletes, or social media personalities. This trust can be exploited by promoting products with exaggerated claims or those lacking scientific backing. 

 

The Case that Triggered the Ruling:

 

The court’s decision stemmed from a case involving Patanjali Ayurved Ltd., a popular Indian consumer goods company, and yoga guru Ramdev. The Indian Medical Association (IMA) filed a plea against the company and Ramdev, accusing them of misleading advertisements and a smear campaign against COVID-19 vaccinations and modern medicine.

 

The Road Ahead:

 

This ruling is a significant step toward protecting consumers from deceptive marketing practices.  It encourages celebrities and public figures to be more selective and responsible about the products they endorse. Additionally, the court urged government bodies to implement procedures for consumers to easily report misleading advertisements. 

 

This move by the Supreme Court is likely to have a ripple effect across the advertising industry in India.  It will force companies to be more transparent and hold celebrities accountable for promoting products they don’t fully understand or that make unsubstantiated claims. 

 

Continue Reading

Latest News

Mercedes Hits the Brakes on EVs: Profit Woes Lead to Focus on Gas-Powered Cars

Published

on

StartupStories - Mercedes

Luxury carmaker Mercedes-Benz is experiencing a shift in gears, prioritizing gasoline-powered vehicles over its previously ambitious electric vehicle (EV) strategy. This comes after disappointing sales figures and shrinking profit margins for their electric offerings.

The Dream Runs out of Charge:

Mercedes, a leader in the luxury car market, had set a goal to be fully electric by 2030. However, sluggish sales of their electric vehicles, particularly the high-end EQS and EQE sedans, have forced a recalibration of their plans. The company’s profit margin dipped to a concerning 9% in the first quarter of 2024, falling below their long-term target range.

Why the Slow Charge?

Several factors are contributing to the lackluster performance of Mercedes’ EVs:

  •  Price Point Pinch: The high price tag of Mercedes’ electric cars, ranging from $70,000 to $120,000, limits their appeal compared to more affordable electric options. 
  •  Competition Heats Up: Other luxury carmakers like Tesla and BMW are offering strong competition, with some even surpassing Mercedes in EV sales growth. 
  •  Infrastructure Concerns: Gaps in charging infrastructure and anxieties about range remain significant deterrents for potential EV buyers.

Back to the Drawing Board:

In response to these challenges, Mercedes CEO Ola Källenius announced a revised strategy. The company will:

  •  Extend Focus on Combustion Engines:  Production of gasoline-powered and hybrid vehicles will continue well into the 2030s, catering to customer demand.
  •  Rethink EV Strategy: Mercedes will analyze consumer preferences and market trends to refine their electric car offerings. This may involve focusing on more affordable models or improving features to enhance range and charging efficiency.

The Road Ahead

The shift by Mercedes highlights the complexities of the automotive industry’s transition to electric vehicles. It underscores the need for car manufacturers to balance ambitious environmental goals with the realities of consumer behavior and market competition.

Is this a Permanent Pause?

While Mercedes is putting the brakes on its all-electric vision, it doesn’t necessarily signal a complete retreat from EVs. The company may leverage this time to strengthen its electric offerings and ensure they are competitive in the rapidly evolving market. Only time will tell if Mercedes can reclaim its position as a leader in the electric vehicle race.

Continue Reading

Artificial Intelligence

Reddit Soars After Strong Earnings and Upbeat Outlook

Published

on

Reddit, the social media platform known for its online communities and meme culture, saw its stock price jump significantly after releasing its first earnings report since going public in March. Investors were impressed by the company’s strong financial performance and optimistic forecasts for the future.

The report highlighted a surge in user engagement, with daily active users increasing by 37% to 82.7 million in the first quarter. This growth was accompanied by an 8% rise in average revenue per user, indicating Reddit’s success in monetizing its platform. 

Perhaps the most significant factor driving the stock price increase was Reddit’s forecast for the second quarter. The company projected revenue to fall between $240 million and $255 million, exceeding analyst expectations. Additionally, Reddit anticipates achieving break-even status or even generating a profit, surpassing predictions of a loss.

This positive outlook can be attributed in part to Reddit’s flourishing advertising business. The company is also capitalizing on a new revenue stream: content licensing deals with artificial intelligence (AI) firms. Reddit’s vast collection of user-generated content provides valuable data for training AI models, attracting companies like Google.

Analysts believe Reddit is still in its early stages of monetization and predict continued growth in the coming quarters, fueled by advancements in ad targeting and measurement tools. This optimism is reflected in the stock price surge, which has climbed roughly 70% since Reddit’s IPO.

Overall, Reddit’s first earnings report paints a bright picture for the company’s future. With a thriving user base, increasing revenue opportunities, and a promising outlook, Reddit appears well-positioned for continued success in the ever-evolving social media landscape.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Recent Posts

Advertisement